What is Ranked Choice Voting and How Does It Work?
In a ranked choice voting election, voters don’t select just one candidate – they rank the candidates from first choice to last. If a candidate wins more than 50% of first-choice votes, they win outright. If not, an instant runoff process kicks in: the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and ballots for that candidate are reallocated to those voters’ next ranked choice. This elimination and redistribution cycle continues in rounds until one candidate secures a majority and is declared the winner.
This means that if your top choice can’t win, your vote isn’t “wasted” – it can still count for your next preferred candidate. The system is intended to ensure the eventual winner has broad support, addressing one common critique of the current method where a candidate can win with a slim plurality.
RCV eliminates the incentive for “strategic voting” (picking the “lesser of two evils”) by allowing voters to vote their conscience – for example, ranking a third-party or outsider candidate first – without fear of inadvertently helping elect their least-favored candidate. As one advocate put it, "we do it every day when we make decisions that have multiple options," always having a backup choice in mind.
RCV vs. Plurality Voting: Pros and Cons
Pros of Ranked Choice Voting:
- Ensures Majority Support: RCV guarantees the winner has support from over 50% of voters (after runoff rounds), rather than winning with a small plurality.
- More Choice, Less “Wasted” Votes: Because voters can rank multiple candidates, they can confidently vote for independent or third-party candidates as their top choice without fear of wasting their vote.
- Reduces Negative Campaigning: Candidates must appeal to a wider audience to earn second- and third-choice votes. As Michigan political reform advocate Katie Fahey puts it: "RCV actually has candidates vying for people’s second choice... [It] changes the incentives for how you run a campaign."
- Encourages Moderate and Diverse Candidates: RCV rewards broad appeal and may help elect more centrist leaders. It can also broaden the candidate pool, increasing representation among women and people of color.
- Voter Satisfaction: In cities that use RCV, surveys show voters understand the system and prefer it over the old method.
Potential Drawbacks and Criticisms:
- Complexity and Voter Education: Critics argue that RCV adds new complexity, potentially confusing voters. In Maine, some legislators say constituents find it difficult to understand.
- Counting Process and Delayed Results: Tallying RCV results can take longer, sometimes leading to delayed outcomes.
- Requires New Infrastructure: Implementing RCV may require upgraded voting machines and voter education campaigns.
- Public Skepticism and Partisan Perceptions: In some states, RCV has been painted as a partisan reform. Opposition campaigns argue it complicates elections and can lead to outcomes that defy voter expectations.
RCV in Action: Where Is It Used in the U.S.?
Ranked choice voting is already in use in many elections across the U.S. Maine became the first state to adopt RCV statewide in 2016, and Alaska followed with a nonpartisan primary + RCV general election model in 2020. In 2022, Mary Peltola won Alaska’s U.S. House race through RCV, even though she wasn't the initial plurality leader.
According to FairVote, RCV is in place for public elections in 52 jurisdictions, reaching nearly 14 million voters. Major cities like New York City, San Francisco, Oakland, Minneapolis, and Santa Fe use RCV in local elections. Even Utah has piloted RCV in more than 20 cities. Skokie, IL, and Charlottesville, VA are the latest to join, and Boston recently approved a proposal to bring RCV to city elections.
However, backlash has also grown. In 2024, voters in DC approved RCV, but voters in Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, and Colorado rejected it. Meanwhile, Missouri voters approved a ban on RCV.
Michigan’s Push for Ranked Choice: Rank MI Vote and the 2026 Campaign
In Michigan, the nonprofit Rank MI Vote is leading a major campaign to get RCV on the 2026 statewide ballot. They aim to amend the state constitution to implement RCV for all state and federal elections, while also giving local governments the freedom to adopt RCV if they choose.
Several cities – East Lansing, Kalamazoo, Royal Oak, and Ann Arbor – have already passed local ballot measures supporting RCV. However, state law currently prevents implementation. The 2026 initiative would remove this barrier.
Rank MI Vote has held a "40 town halls in 40 days" tour, building a grassroots movement of over 1,000 volunteers. They are modeling their campaign after the successful 2018 anti-gerrymandering initiative led by Katie Fahey, which created Michigan's Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission.
Ron Zimmerman, Rank MI Vote’s executive director, explains: *"One thing ranked choice does is help reduce the extremity in our politics. Because it requires a 50% winner, every candidate has to appeal to a much broader swath of the community."
Rank MI Vote plans to finalize petition language and begin signature collection in late 2025. Their goal: let Michiganders decide whether to adopt a voting system that supporters say is more representative, more civil, and more democratic.
The Road Ahead
Ranked choice voting in the United States is at a turning point. It has already transformed elections in Maine, Alaska, and major cities nationwide. It has been embraced by diverse voters, candidates, and communities. But it also faces legal and political obstacles, as well as opposition campaigns that call it confusing or partisan.
For Michigan and the rest of the country, the next few years could be decisive. Will RCV continue to expand, reshaping how Americans vote? Or will it remain a reform tried only in pockets? As Rank MI Vote puts it, the power is now in voters' hands.